VIDEO
Experts, Industry Leaders, Decision Makers Meet to Discuss World's Water Problems
QUICK HITS
QUICK POLL
Note: There are no active polls available.
Epic Vancouver 2011
EFEF2010

NEWS

Save the Eco Fee

July 27, 2010
Save the Eco Fee

Toronto, July 27, 2010 - In what may be a classic tale of ensuring the baby is not thrown out with the bathwater, Ontario's Environmental Commissioner Gord Miller has waded into the on going debate about the imposition and sudden withdrawal of 'eco-fees' for the disposal of household hazardous wastes. 

Ontario's program for managing hazardous waste is an important step in the right direction and should not be scrapped, said Commissioner Miller in a Special Report, released today. The report notes, however, that the program is not perfect, and offers recommendations for its improvement.

On July 1st Ontario began collecting an Eco fee on thousands of hazardous consumer products under the Municipal Hazardous or Special Waste Program.  No one seemed to understand what the fee was for or how it worked. Consumers balked at yet another charge that looked like a tax.  Retailers revolted.

Ontario environment Minister, John Garretson, wrote a scathing letter to Gemma Zecchini,  head of Stewardship Ontario, on July 13. On July 20,  Garretsen announced that  he had suspended the fees on most hazardous consumer products for 90 days.

Miller fears the controversy and confusion over the implementation of the second phase of the hazardous waste management program, particularly the unfortunate decision by some retailers to invent the concept of "eco fees", could jeopardize the future of this necessary program.

His report aims to provide clarity about the program and refocus the discussion back on the core issue: how to manage - and finance the management of - hazardous wastes.

"While not perfect, the hazardous waste program is definitely a step in the right direction. It will keep more hazardous materials out of our environment and will take the cost of managing these wastes off the taxpayer and put it where it belongs: on the manufacturers of the hazardous waste products," said Miller.

Miller's report, called "Getting it Right, Paying for the Management of Household Hazardous Wastes," was actually planned as part of his annual report but he decided to release it now because of the government's move to revamp the recycling plan in three months.

Despite the Commissioner's support for the program, his report identifies some necessary areas for improvement and provides two key recommendations.

"Greener products" should have lower fees.

"A critical problem with the program is there's no incentive for manufacturers to make their products greener since they are all charged the same 'steward fee' regardless of how environmentally friendly their products are," Miller continued. "Greener products should have lower fees. This would encourage competition between companies, which should result in less toxic and more recyclable products, and keep the program costs in check."

"Another problem with Ontario's program is that manufacturers only pay for the management of wastes collected through the program, and not for wastes going to landfill. Because Stewardship Ontario aims to collect only 42% of the available hazardous waste in the program's first year, taxpayers will still be footing the bill for managing more than half of Ontario's hazardous waste."

Responding to the report Stewardship Ontario's Gemma Zecchini issues a statement thankingCommissioner Gord Miller for his "thought-provoking report."

"Stewardship Ontario is committed to playing its role in enhancing Ontario's environment and any advice or support, particularly from someone with Mr. Miller's background and expertise, will be taken very seriously," she said.

"Over the next few weeks, we will be studying Mr. Miller's report, and consulting with our stakeholders, and will make any changes that will improve our organization, our program and Ontario's natural environment," she added.

Click here to download the report.

Source: www.eco.on.ca

This article has been viewed 199 times