Isaac Valero Ladron, the European Commission's spokesman on
climate matters, said the EU executive "remains confident that
Chinese airlines will comply with EU legislation when operating
through EU airports."
The Chinese government said on Monday (6 February) it had barred
the country's airlines from joining the EU scheme, which slaps a
charge for carbon emissions on all flights into and out of
Europe.
But the European Commission, which polices the EU scheme, warned
that financial penalties would apply to airlines that refuse to
comply with it. According to EU sources, the scheme would add less
than €2 to the price of a flight from Shanghai to Europe.
"It would be much more costly for any airline not to comply with
the legislation than doing so," Ladron told a press briefing.
Airlines that fail to comply will be slapped a fine of €100 for
each tonne of CO2 emitted, he said.
Chinese airlines, the Commission's spokesperson added, had
already taken steps to comply with the scheme and had applied for
free carbon allowances to which they are entitled.
"We have good reasons to believe that in the end Chinese
airlines will participate in this scheme," said an EU source who
preferred not to be named.
Dispute clouds EU-China summit
The hardening of the dispute came only a week before Chinese and
EU leaders hold a summit in Beijing on 14 February where the
airline carbon row looks set to be a major irritant.
The aviation row also comes as eurozone countries have looked to
China, with its big holdings of foreign exchange reserves, for a
show of economic support while they grapple with the latest phase
of their debt crisis.
Ladron said the Commission will continue to engage with China
and others to solve the aviation row. "Of course political
discussions will go on," he said in reference to the upcoming
EU-China summit.
He added that the EU executive would be "very happy" to amend
its emissions scheme if a global agreement to curb airline
emissions is found at the International Civil Aviation Organisation
(ICAO).
"So far this is not the case. So we're not backing down and our
legislation will apply to companies operating in Europe."
'Equivalent measures'
Ladron said foreign countries could exempt their airlines from
the EU scheme if they adopted similar "equivalent measures" at
home. These measures can take the form of a carbon cap-and-trade
scheme, like in Europe, but not necessarily, he said.
"We're not saying to the Chinese that it has to be a carbon
market as the EU has opted to do. But we're telling them that this
our environmental legislation, it applies in Europe. If you want to
do business in Europe, you have to respect the law."
Speaking to EurActiv in an interview last week, Connie Hedegaard,
the EU's climate action commissioner, said Chinese authorities had
suggested they could set targets for their own aviation sector.
"As soon as I saw that, I wrote to the Chinese authorities and
said, 'let's discuss that'. They came forward with a figure and we
are now discussing with them what it means," she told EurActiv.
EU scheme legal
Asked about the legality of the EU scheme, Ladron referred to
a December 2011 ruling by the European Court of
Justice, which denied a challenge by a group of US
airlines.
"The only body which can interpret European law is the European
Court of Justice," Ladron said in response to questions about the
possibility of further legal complaints by Chinese or US
airlines.
In a letter sent to EU officials in December, Secretary of State
Hillary Clinton and US Secretary of Transportation Raymond LaHood
urged the EU "to reconsider this current course" and re-engage with
the rest of the world.
In December, the China Air Transport Association (CATA) urged
China's airlines to refuse to take part in the emissions
scheme.
POSITIONS:
Peter Liese, a German Centre-Right MEP who is the
European Parliament's rapporteur on the aviation sector's inclusion
in the EU emissions trading scheme, said Europe should stand
firm.
"If we give in because of a €1.90 additional cost for a flight
to Shanghai, this will have major implications for the credibility
of the EU in other policy areas," said Liese, who is from the
European People's Party (EPP), the largest political group in the
European Parliament.
"We should continue to negotiate and show flexibility in the
agreed legislation, but we should defend our law and not give in",
said Liese, adding that "the legislation foresees flexibility on
incoming flights."
"Everything we do must be non-discriminatory. We cannot give
derogations to China which we do not give to EU airlines flying
from China to Europe. We should implement our legislation,
otherwise this will be interpreted as a precedent for many other
issues."
Sanjeev Kumar, a campaigner at the environmental group
E3G, said the EU should toughen its stance on
Chinese airlines and enforce sanctions. "The EU must now instruct
all airports to deny access to Chinese airlines as this is the only
way to protect the rule of law."
The majority of governments in Europe were not aware of the
intention of the Chinese government to ban airlines from using the
aviation ETS and they think that still this is not certain,
industry sources told EurActiv.