GLOBE-Net, July 12, 2012 - The repeal
and re-enactment of the Canadian Environmental
Assessment Act ("CEAA") and amendments to other federal
environmental legislation amounts to the most significant change in
federal environmental assessment ("EA") since the legislation was
first created decades ago.
These
amendments are clearly aimed at increasing investment in extractive
industries by encouraging certainty, reducing regulatory
duplication and shortening delays. The implications of these
changes are vast and their full impact on the mining industry is
not known.
This is the third
article in our series on the changes to the federal environmental
assessment regime and what that means for mining in Ontario. Our first article provided a general overview of
the changes and our second article discussed changes in CEAA
related to Aboriginal consultation. In this article, we discuss how
the new CEAA will interact with several changes to Ontario mining
legislation to create a new Aboriginal consultation regime in
Ontario.
Since the
amendment of the Constitution in 1982 to include recognition of
Aboriginal and Treaty rights, Canadian governments have been
engaged in a process of reforming laws and policies to recognize
these new rights. To prevent conflicts with Aboriginal peoples, the
2007 Ipperwash inquiry identified the regulation and development of
natural resources on Aboriginal lands as a key area of reform.
Justice Linden concluded that the
management of natural resources must take
into account the rights and interests of Aboriginal people more
effectively. I believe there are ways of sharing and co-managing
natural resources that are consistent with Aboriginal and treaty
rights while serving the interests of first nations and the people
of Ontario.
It is against this
backdrop that Ontario has announced new changes to facilitate
Aboriginal consultation for mining in Ontario. As described below,
the new regulations proposed under Ontario'sMining Actand theFar
North Actamount to a new paradigm for mining and Aboriginal
consultation in Ontario. We hope that the requirements for
consultation in Ontario will also satisfy CEAA requirements but
this is far from certain.
Changes to
Ontario's Mining Act and Regulations
The purpose
clause of the Mining Act has been amended. Mineral
resources must now be developed in a manner consistent with the
recognition and affirmation of existing Treaty and Aboriginal
rights including the duty to consult. This change in purpose has
led to a new regulatory scheme that is expected to include detailed
consultation requirements at each stage in the mine development
process from early exploration to mine closure.
Under the proposed regulations, Aboriginal
peoples must be notified when mining claims are recorded within
their traditional use areas. Exploration plans are required for low
impact activities (e.g. surveys that require a power generator) and
exploration permits are required for moderate impact activities
(e.g. drilling with equipment over 150 kg). For both exploration
plans and permits, miners must notify / consult with Aboriginal
peoples. Aboriginal peoples will have the ability to make their
concerns and objections known at the start of the mining process.
While this is likely to reduce conflicts, it could greatly lengthen
the mine development process. Further, sites of Aboriginal cultural
significance have been withdrawn from claim staking.
The proposed exploration planning and
permitting requirements in the Mining Act are not
expected to directly interact with the changes to CEAA, a since
they operate at different stages in the mine development process.
However, Aboriginal consultation requirements for mine production
and closure plans could significantly overlap with the Aboriginal
consultation requirements under the new CEAA. At present it is
unclear if consultation under the Mining Act will
count as consultation under the new CEAA regime or if additional
consultations will be required. If these two requirements are not
harmonized it could lengthen the environmental assessment and
Aboriginal consultation process.
The New Far North Act
The Far North Act is essentially
a land use planning statute for the northern-most 42% of Ontario.
This huge area is home to 24,000 people, 90% of whom are
Aboriginal. While half of the 450,000 km2 in the far north must be an
interconnected protected area, one of the most important pieces of
information for miners is that mines cannot be opened until
community-based land use plans are developed for each region in the
far north.
The land use planning process must be
initiated by Aboriginal peoples in each area and the final plan
must be approved by not only the Ontario government but each of the
participating First Nation bands in the area. So far, only four
land use plans have been developed in the far north and it could be
a long-time before a significant portion of the far north is open
to mining. The policies used to develop additional land use plans
under the Far North Act will strongly influence
whether these plans satisfy some or all of the EA and Aboriginal
consultation requirements under the new CEAA.
South of the Far North Act area,
Crown land use plans may be prepared under s. 12 of the
Public Lands Act. Where approved plans exist, activities
carried out in the planning area must be consistent with the
approved plan. At present, Crown Land Use Planning Guidelines are
for the most part silent on addressing mining or the concerns of
Aboriginal peoples and do not assess impacts on Aboriginal peoples
or the natural environment as required by CEAA.
A New
Aboriginal Consultation Paradigm
Between the
changes to CEAA, the new Mining Act purpose clause and regulations
and the Far North Act, Aboriginal law is now firmly embedded in the
mine development process from start to finish. There are now
regulatory and Aboriginal consultation requirements for miners in
Ontario starting with early exploration plans and ending with mine
closure plans. Aboriginal participation and cooperation is now a
core part of the CEAA environmental assessment process (see our second article). These changes, taken
together, are beginning to operationalize the Aboriginal provisions
of the Constitution and give some sense of what these rights mean
in practice.
However, many
questions remain unanswered. With all of these new Aboriginal
consultation requirements at both the federal and provincial
levels, it is unclear if there will be sufficient coordination (or
harmonization) between the Ontario and the Federal government to
make this Aboriginal consultation regime work in practice.
Aboriginal consultation at the provincial level must be accepted to
meet federal requirements and vice versa. Federal-provincial
harmonization of environmental assessments (including Aboriginal
consultation) was a key recommendation of the Drummond Report (see
our March 2012 article) but it has not yet been
implemented into practice.
At a minimum,
coordination between federal and provincial governments should
include:
- The sharing and acceptance of information between federal
and provincial authorities (including Aboriginal consultation
information);
- Allowing federal and provincial regulatory processes to
run concurrently and
- Timely review by both levels of government.
Otherwise, the
new Aboriginal consultation regime will create significant delays
for miners and we suspect that governments may be forced to use the
highly controversial cabinet override provisions contained in each
of the these statues to ensure that projects are not cancelled
because of endless delays.
Linden,
Sidney B. Report of the Ipperwash Inquiry. Toronto: Published by
Ministry of the Attorney General, Queen's Printer for Ontario, 2007
at Volume 2, page 44.
This is the
third article in a series by Fraser Milner Casgrain LLP on the
proposed changes to the federal environmental assessment regime and
what that means for mining in Ontario. Authors: David
Hunter, Nalin Sahni and George McKibbon (McKibbon Wakefield Inc.)
Printed here with the kind permission of the
authors.