• Main
  • Social Media

Upcoming Events »

VIDEO »

Address the Excess - A Recipe for Cutting Food Waste:

No risk with GMO food, says EU chief scientific advisor

July 24, 2012
No risk with GMO food, says EU chief scientific advisor

24 July 2012 - EurActiv  - Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are no riskier than their conventionally farmed equivalents, the European Commission's Chief Scientific Advisor Anne Glover has told EurActiv in an exclusive interview, calling for countries impeding GMO use to be put to proof.

The endorsement of GMO safety will rattle member states where bans are in place (see background), and represents the CSA's highest-profile policy intervention since Glover became Commission President José Manuel Barroso's scientific advisor last December.

"There is no substantiated case of any adverse impact on human health, animal health or environmental health, so that's pretty robust evidence, and I would be confident in saying that there is no more risk in eating GMO food than eating conventionally farmed food,"  Glover told EurActiv, saying the precautionary principle no longer applies as a result.

Glover said she was not promoting GMOs, and added that "eating food is risky", explaining: "Most of us forget that most plants are toxic, and it's only because we cook them, or the quantity that we eat them in, that makes them suitable."

Scarce resources

But she said that scientific evidence needed to play a stronger role in policymaking, firing a warning shot at countries that have banned GMOs. "I think we could really get somewhere in Europe if when evidence is used partially, there were an obligation on people to say why they have rejected evidence," she said.

GMOs and other scientific advances must be explored in order to head off the increasing scarcity of energy and other resources and competition for land use, Glover suggested.

"If we are using land to produce biofuels, we are not producing food, and that that means we have to intensify food production," she said.

Glover, a former professor of biology at the University of Aberdeen, served as chief scientific advisor for Scotland before from 2006-2011. She joined the Commission on 1 January.

Her role is to bolster scientific evidence by saying things that politicians and officials are sometimes uncomfortable with, she said, adding: "The evidence with which I work is independent, the evidence with which I work does not change according to political philosophy. And that should give people a lot of confidence."

Glover said that discomfort around the subject of GM crops in the 1980s and 1990s was "a generation ago, we've moved on and the challenges are completely different".

Read the full article here

 
This article has been viewed 494 times
 

2 Comments:

No to GMO says:
Anne Glover should get an education. First off, cooking plant food actually makes them toxic, not the other way around. Second, the alleged purpose of GMOs is to kill insects and pests. So to say there is no substantiated evidence that they do harm, is a complete & utter lie. If they harm pests/insects(kidney failure & other effects), in larger doses they will have the same impact on humans. Third, countries should have no obligation to say why they won't accept GMOs. We want our food natural & not genetically modified! If given the choice, NO consumer will choose GMOs! Anne Glover you should be ashamed spreading such lies and deceit in the name of money.
No to GMO says:
Anne Glover should get an education. First off, cooking plant food actually makes them toxic, not the other way around. Second, the alleged purpose of GMOs is to kill insects and pests. So to say there is no substantiated evidence that they do harm, is a complete & utter lie. If they harm pests/insects(kidney failure & other effects), in larger doses they will have the same impact on humans. Third, countries should have no obligation to say why they won't accept GMOs. We want our food natural & not genetically modified! If given the choice, NO consumer will choose GMOs! Anne Glover you should be ashamed spreading such lies and deceit in the name of money.